Today's New York Times has yet another example of overhyping science. Recently Nature, Science, Wired, and now the Times are all gaga over alleged breakthroughs in discovering how life came to be. It turns out they are no closer now than they ever have been. It's as if they've figured out the chemical components of ink and paper and how ink adheres to paper, but still can't explain the meaning and information communicated by the New York Times each day with that ink and paper. Never mind figuring out where the ink and paper itself came from before it got hitched together. Here we are celebrating the 200th anniversary of Darwin and modern evolutionists are no closer to figure out where life comes from than Darwin himself was.
Dr. Meyer responded to the Times today over at Evolution News & Views:
Today's New York Times features an article by science writer Nicholas Wade highlighting what Wade calls "surprising advances [that] have renewed confidence that a terrestrial explanation for life's origins will eventually emerge."
Yet the scientists quoted in the article fail to address the fundamental issue that has generated the longstanding impasse in the field: the problem of the origin of biological information.
Wade describes the various developments in pre-biotic chemistry that are making some scientists more optimistic about solving the problem of the origin of life. Yet, the central problem facing them is not the synthesis of pre-biotic building blocks or even discovering an environment in which life might have plausibly arisen--difficult as these problems have proven to be. Instead, the fundamental problem is getting the chemical building blocks to arrange themselves into the large information-bearing molecules (such as DNA and RNA) that direct the show in living cells.
Even the experiments of Gerald Joyce that Wade describes do not address this problem. The "self-replicating" RNA molecules that Joyce constructs are not capable of copying a template of information from free standing chemical subunits as the polymerase machinery does in actual cells. Instead, in Joyce's experiment, a pre-synthesized specifically-sequenced RNA molecule merely catalyzes a single chemical bond, thus fusing two other pre-synthesized partial RNA chains. More significantly, Joyce intelligently arranged the matching base sequences in these RNA chains. Thus, as my forthcoming book Signature in the Cell shows, Joyce's experiments not only demonstrate that self-replication itself depends upon information-rich molecules, but they also confirm that intelligent design is the only known means by which information arises.
Signature in the Cell continues to move up the ranks at Amazon.com.
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #672 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)
#1 in Books > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Astronomy > Cosmology
#1 in Books > Science > Astronomy > Cosmology
#1 in Books > Science > Physics > Cosmology
You can get a good sneak peek inside Signature in the Cell over at the Harper Collins website. Click here to Browse Inside.
You can read a short report about the event from David Klinghoffer at Evolution News & Views.
The first three interview segments with Dr. Meyer from ID The Future are available now.
The Making of an ID Theorist: Stephen C. Meyer and the Origin of Life
Click here to listen.
This episode of ID the Future tells the story of how philosopher of science Stephen C. Meyer first began his quest for the origin of life. How did one of the architects of the intelligent design movement move from the oilfields of Texas to the study halls of Cambridge to pursue the mystery of where biological information originated? Listen in and find out.
Delving Into Science at Cambridge: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 2
Click here to listen.
On this episode of ID the Future philosopher of science Stephen C. Meyer continues the story of how he became involved in intelligent design, sharing some of what he studied while at Cambridge University. What methods do scientists use to study biological origins? Is there a distinctive method of historical scientific inquiry? Meyer set off to investigate not only the history of scientific ideas about the origin of life, but also questions about the definition of science and about how scientists study and reason about ancient events in the past. Listen in to learn, and check out Dr. Meyer's new book, Signature in the Cell, which tells more of the story, the culmination of over 20 years of study and research on the origins of life.
DNA Evidence for Design: Stephen C. Meyer and Signature in the Cell, Part 3
Click here to listen.
On this episode of ID the Future CSC Director Stephen C. Meyer explains the problem that information presents to origin of life researchers within a naturalistic paradigm. Information within the cell presents a daunting challenge to Darwin's theory -- and provides significant evidence for a signature of a designing intelligence, as Meyer explains in his new book.