Stephen Meyer and Signature in the Cell on CBN News
In case you missed your chance to listen live last week, you can now listen to Dr. Stephen C. Meyer's interview on the nationally syndicated Michael Medved Show here. Meyer and Medved discuss the information revolution and the challenge it presents for Darwinism, as well as the argument for intelligent design from information.
CSC Director Stephen C. Meyer recently appeared on Jan Mickelson's talk show to discuss his new book, Signature in the Cell. Now you can download audio and listen in as Meyer discusses Francis Collins, Carl Sagan, the information embedded in DNA, and how arch-atheist Richard Dawkins anticipated the title of Dr. Meyer's new book.
Stephen Meyer has an interesting op-ed in today's Boston Globe about founding father Thomas Jefferson's view of intelligent design. A view which Meyer argues comes from the scientific evidence, not from religious authority, and which is foundational to our nation's adherence to inalienable rights for all:
Contemplating everything from the heavenly bodies down to the creaturely bodies of men and animals, he argued: "It is impossible, I say, for the human mind not to believe that there is, in all this, design, cause and effect, up to an ultimate cause, a fabricator of all things from matter and motion.''
The "ultimate cause'' and "fabricator of all things'' that Jefferson invoked was also responsible for the "design'' of life's endlessly diverse forms as well as the manifestly special endowments of human beings. Moreover, because the evidence of "Nature's God'' was publicly accessible to all and did not depend upon a special appeal to religious authority, Jefferson believed that it provided a basis in reason for the protection of individual liberty. Thus, the Declaration of Independence asserted that humans are "endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.''
Of course, many people assume that Jefferson's views, having been written before Darwin's "Origin of Species,'' are now scientifically obsolete. But Jefferson has been vindicated by modern scientific discoveries that Darwin could not have anticipated.
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer spoke to a full house at the Seattle Art Museum's Plestscheef Auditorium last night presenting compelling evidence for intelligence behind the origin of life. (Below are some pictures of the event.)
On a beautiful summer evening in downtown Seattle, an eager crowd of over 200 relaxed inside the museum's state-of-the-art theater to hear Dr. Meyer explain the problem of "The DNA Enigma" -- that is, where does the highly specified and complex information inside the cell come from?
In a presentation taped by C-SPAN for its Booknotes program, Dr. Meyer used many examples from our computerized age to show that information is a prerequisite for function and construction and that intelligence is always behind the creation and development of that information. The audience was captivated by new, cutting-edge animation revealing the remarkable intricacies of the living cell.
Dr. Meyer impressed upon the audience that intelligence, rather than chance and necessity, is the best explanation for the origin of information transmitted by DNA. This conclusion is not a negative argument from ignorance, Dr. Meyer reinforced, but rather a positive inference to the best explanation, based precisely on what we know in science about the products of design and the information bearing properties of the cell.
At the end of the evening, Dr. Meyer addressed thoughtful questions and signed a lot of books. By evidence of the many fans that waited in line for Dr. Meyer's signature in their book, it is clear Signature in the Cell strikes a chord and will have widespread relevance to the ongoing national discussion about intelligent design and evolution.
If you missed the chance to celebrate this groundbreaking book release with Dr. Meyer, be sure to mark you calendar for another Signature in the Cell event being held at Discovery Institute on September 16th. As soon as an air date is announced by C-SPAN's Booknotes we will post that information on the books website at www.signatureinthecell.com.
Over at Ligonier Ministries there is a very thoughtful review of Signature in the Cell.
Those who are committed to an atheistic and materialist philosophy will be all over this book, but I am slightly optimistic that it may actually change the nature of the debate among scientists who are interested in going where the evidence leads. In fact, one of the most helpful sections of this book deals with the very definition of "science," an issue that has hindered helpful discussions and debates.Read the rest here.
Although I enthusiastically recommend Meyer's book to any who are interested in the scientific study of the origin of life, I do want to raise one important point. Advocates of intelligent design are directing most of their efforts toward addressing scientific questions and objections. They are not addressing the questions theologians might have about the implications of their work.
Tonight Stephen Meyer will be on Coast to Coast with George Noory. Dr. Meyer will be on from 11:00 pm to 2:00 am PT, and as an extra incentive for our readers who aren't night owls, the show promises to "discuss recent discoveries in cell biology which support intelligent design and reveal that digital computers and living cells are operating on the same principles."
To find an affiliate station in your area and tune in, click here.
Synopsis Of The Second Chapter Of Signature In The Cell by Stephen Meyer posted at The ID Report:
When the 19th century chemist Friedrich Wohler synthesized urea in the lab using simple chemistry, he set in motion the ball that would ultimately knock down the then-pervasive 'Vitalistic' view of biology. Life's chemistry, rather than being bound by immaterial 'vital forces' could indeed by artificially made. While Charles Darwin offered little insight on how life originated, several key scientists would later jump on Wohler's 'Eureka'-style discovery through public proclamations of their own 'origin of life' theories. The ensuing materialist view was espoused by the likes of Ernst Haeckel and Rudolf Virchow who built their own theoretical suppositions on Wohler's triumph. Meyer summed up the logic of the dayKeep reading here.
"If organic matter could be formed in the laboratory by combining two inorganic chemical compounds then perhaps organic matter could have formed the same way in nature in the distant past" (p.40)
Darwin's theory generated the much-needed ...