« Matheson's Intron Fairy Tale | Main | The Fact-Free "Science" of Matheson, Hunt and Moran: Ridicule Instead of Reason, Authority Instead of Evidence »

Ayala: "For the record, I read Signature in the Cell"


At Evolution News & Views Jay Richards weighs in on whether Francisco Ayala read and understood Signature in the Cell.

Over at BioLogos, Professor Francisco Ayala has responded to Signature of Controversy--the collection of responses to criticisms of Signature in the Cell. As with the previous Ayala response at BioLogos, this one includes an introduction by Darrell Falk.

The burden of Ayala's response is to wax indignant that some of us have suggested, based on his original "response" to Signature in the Cell, that he had not actually read the book. Why would we suggest that? Well, because he so profoundly misrepresented Meyer's thesis.

Here's what he said: "The keystone argument of Signature [sic] of the Cell is that chance, by itself, cannot account for the genetic information found in the genomes of organisms." He goes on to suggest that Meyer spends "most" of his book attempting to refute the chance hypothesis. Really.

This is such a whopper that I would have expected Ayala not to bring it up again. But in his current response, he begins:

Keep reading here.

About

This page contains a single entry posted on June 4, 2010 3:18 PM.

More can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.